U15 Piger
Ranking
| Place | Name | Ranking Points | Seeding Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olivia Arboe Andersen | 160 | 29.33 |
| 2 | Sofia Meden Sørensen | 157 | 28.83 |
| 3 | Solveig Skou | 144 | 29.00 |
| 4 | Andrea Ørsted | 132 | 26.50 |
| 5 | Karla Brauner Andersen | 128 | 29.17 |
| 6 | 100 | 20.50 | |
| 7 | Liva León Verdelin | 96 | 19.83 |
| 8 | Julie Hyttelkjær | 85 | 25.80 |
| Silje | 85 | 25.80 | |
| 10 | Olivia Thye | 77 | 24.00 |
| 11 | 74 | 22.00 | |
| 12 | 67 | 23.50 | |
| 13 | Aya | 60 | 30.00 |
| Karen Holleufer-Sørensen | 60 | 30.00 | |
| 15 | Nika Oliinyk | 47 | 26.00 |
| Signe Mosgaard | 47 | 26.00 | |
| 17 | Vibe Engedal | 40 | 13.00 |
| Ville Noomi Vårlid | 40 | 13.00 | |
| 19 | Anna Møller Hejlesen | 34 | 16.25 |
| 20 | 29 | 21.00 | |
| Julia Jørgensen | 29 | 21.00 | |
| Sofia Bisgaard | 29 | 21.00 | |
| 23 | Maya Marzec | 28 | 16.67 |
| 24 | Selma Mejlvang Vestergaard | 25 | 20.67 |
| Naz | 25 | 20.67 | |
| 26 | 18 | 22.50 | |
| 27 | Emma | 17 | 17.00 |
| Mathilde Ramsgaard Sørensen | 17 | 17.00 | |
| 29 | 17 | 21.00 | |
| Eda:) | 17 | 21.00 | |
| 31 | Eva Greger Hutchins | 15 | 19.00 |
| 32 | Majse Rigmor Hollensted | 14 | 11.67 |
| Lilli Petersen | 14 | 11.67 | |
| 34 | Scarlett | 13 | 13.00 |
| 13 | 13.00 | ||
| 36 | Rosalinde Ditlev Borup | 13 | 16.00 |
| 37 | 12 | 15.00 | |
| Zülal Dal | 12 | 15.00 | |
| Bella Droob Espersen | 12 | 15.00 | |
| 40 | Nanna Poulsen | 8 | 21.00 |
| 8 | 21.00 | ||
| 42 | Anna Kerekes | 7 | 17.00 |
| Maria Nielsen | 7 | 17.00 | |
| Isabell Grace Harris | 7 | 17.00 | |
| 45 | Seraphina Vilhelmsen | 6 | 15.00 |
| Emma Inoue | 6 | 15.00 | |
| Sofie Bamberger Grøn | 6 | 15.00 | |
| Maren Rosenbeck Gøeg | 6 | 15.00 | |
| 49 | Clara Lundbaek | 4 | 11.00 |
| Anna Walbum | 4 | 11.00 |
Select a tournament to see the standings
| Name | Sport | Start Date | Event |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loading Tournaments ... | |||
| Name | Start Date | |
|---|---|---|
| Loading Events ... | ||
Historic ranking
Disclaimer: Rankings calculations may differ from the correct historical rankings. This may be due to, among other things, that manually entered points were included in the rankings of the time or that current manual points are included.